Cases 1 - 10 of 3,495
WRIGHT v. BROWN et al
as 5:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
WALTER LEE WRIGHT
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER P GOLDEN and BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. North et al
as 5:2024cv00509
Defendant:
FNU Browne, FNU Langley, FNU North and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. State D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00064
Defendant:
State D.O.C., Jackson, Officer Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Deundre Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. FBI Dickson et al
as 1:2024cv03946
Defendant:
Croford, Brian Dickerson, FBI Dickson and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARGILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2024cv00344
Defendant:
BROWN, GABBY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
QUINCETTA Y CARGILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westberry Jr, Deoin v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv23305
Plaintiff:
Deoin T. Westberry Jr
Defendant:
David Beantencourt, Lindsay Davis, Brenda Bretas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
FULTON v. FOSTON et al
as 5:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
350621 RANDALL FULTON
Defendant:
MS MOSELEY, MS BONNER, JEREMY FOSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Thomas et al
as 1:2024cv03798
Defendant:
FCI ATLANTA and Warden Thomas
Plaintiff:
Devron Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Walker et al
as 7:2024cv01160
Defendant:
Yates, Jonathon Horton, Deputy Peek and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Derrell Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KROFT v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00324
Defendant:
BURKE, BROWN, RICKY DIXON and others
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE KROFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
