Cases 1 - 10 of 123
AMMONS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 5:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY AMMONS, IV
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and BIBB COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DAVIS
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
WILLIE DANTE SMITH
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMMONS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 5:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY AMMONS, IV
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramiro Contreras v. Bibb County CF Warden
as 24-10996
Petitioner:
RAMIRO DELREAL CONTRERAS
Respondent:
BIBB COUNTY CF WARDEN
ROOKS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY, JUDGE HOWARD Z SIMMS and ADA DOROTHY V HULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. LONG
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
GLEN SPEARING MATTHEWS
Defendant:
ROBERT R LONG, HARRY J FOX, JR, JOHN FRANCISCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. ROBERTS et al
as 5:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
CODY ROBERTS
Defendant:
JAY ROBERTS and BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Bibb County Correctional Facility Medical Staff
as 7:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Terry Perkins
Defendant:
Bibb County Correctional Facility Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNYDER v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
ERIC EUGENE SNYDER, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVIS DAVIS, BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, BORIUDIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Bibb County Correctional Facility
as 7:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Deonte Hudson
Defendant:
Bibb County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
