Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Renney v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen Renney
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Commissioner John Hamm, Commissioner Jeff Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Surles v. Conn et al
as 2:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Christopher Surles
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Blalock, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Blalock et al
as 5:2021cv01391
Plaintiff:
Matthew Shane Sullivan
Defendant:
J Blalock, P Shala, T McElroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Ivey et al
as 1:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Doctor Bose, Therapist Pearson, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Nevis Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aker v. Nichols et al
as 5:2020cv00979
Respondent:
Nichols, Wilson Blalock and Floyd Lee
Petitioner:
Joshua D Aker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Blalock v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2019cv00635
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Robert S. Blalock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blalock v. Georgia Regional Private Investigation et al
as 1:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Georgia Regional Private Investigation and Sam Fontana Corporation
Plaintiff:
Scott B. Blalock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blalock v. Fulton County Rice St. Jail et al
as 1:2019cv00167
Defendant:
Sergeant, Lietenant, Major and others
Plaintiff:
Scott B. Blalock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blalock v. Wallace et al
as 2:2018cv01428
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Kevin Moses, Jeff Bagwell and others
Plaintiff:
Charles David Blalock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Gentry et al
as 5:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
David Dotson
Defendant:
Matt Gentry, James Markey, Captain Lee and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
