Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hill v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Roy Devon Hill
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Pat Labat, Lenwood Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Callaway et al
as 1:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dennis Maurice Roberson
Defendant:
Rolanda Callaway, Steven T. Marshall and Adrienne Givens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CALLAWAY v. WILLIAMS
as 3:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
MAURICE CALLAWAY and PRINCESS CALLAWAY
Respondent:
WARDEN DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberson v. Callaway et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Dennis Maurice Roberson
Defendant:
Rolanda Callaway and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. MORALES et al
as 5:2021cv00138
Defendant:
WARDEN JOSE MORALES, DEPUTY WARDEN TOMMY COFFEE, LT CLUBPER and others
Plaintiff:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Callaway et al
as 5:2021cv00064
Respondent:
Rhonda Callaway and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Carlos Hammonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McConico v. Top Golf Birmingham Bar et al
as 2:2020cv01156
Defendant:
Dolf Berle, Callaway Golf Company, Oliver G Brewer, III and others
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Callaway v. Jackson
as 1:2020cv01842
Respondent:
Theodore "Ted" Jackson
Petitioner:
Sinquai Callaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Callaway v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2020cv00561
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Antonio Dante Callaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
