Cases 1 - 10 of 156
GOODEN v. PHAMS et al
as 5:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
JR JIMMY GOODEN
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN WATSON, WARDEN PHAMS and MEDICAL DIRECTOR CECIL SISKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WOLFE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WOLFE and HALCYON WOLFE
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNITED STATES, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil Buckner v. USA
as 24-10001
Petitioner:
CECIL DANTE BUCKNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Edward Craig, II v. Pinellas County Sheriff, et al
as 23-13490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD CECIL CRAIG, II
Defendant / Appellee:
PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF, FOOD SERVICE DIRECTOR, CHAPLAIN HANSON and others
Edward Craig, II v. Bob Gualtieri, et al
as 23-13491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD CECIL CRAIG, II
Defendant / Appellee:
BOB GUALTIERI, STANFIELD, DEPUTY CAMINERO and others
Evans v. Easterling Correctional Facility (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Cecil Leon Evans
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Seminole County et al
as 6:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
Jamie C. Warner
Defendant:
Seminole County, Dennis Lemma, City of Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Stevens v. The Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Cecil Stevens
Defendant:
The Florida Department of Corrections, Coty Michael Wiltgen, William Story Shackelford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Warner v. Lima et al
as 6:2022cv02336
Plaintiff:
Jamie C. Warner
Defendant:
Sheriff L. Lima, Chief L. Bedard, Captain Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
