Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Greene v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange)
as 6:2023cv01538
Petitioner:
Alonzo Charles Greene
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dexter Jackson v. Lavar Ham, et al
as 23-11440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEXTER CONRAD JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LAVAR HAM, CHARLES GREEN, LARHONDA HOLIDAY and others
Dexter Jackson v. Lavar Ham, et al
as 23-10627
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEXTER CONRAD JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LAVAR HAM, badge # 3127 Fulton County Sheriff's Dept. Detention Officer, CHARLES GREEN, badge #SO8569 Fulton County Sheriff's Dept. EMS Officer, LARHONDA HOLIDAY, badge #0157 Sergeant, Fulton County Sheriff's Dept. and others
Dexter Conrad Jackson v. Lavar Ham, et al
as 22-13028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEXTER CONRAD JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LAVAR HAM, badge # 3127 Fulton County Sheriff's Dept. Detention Officer, CHARLES GREEN, badge #SO8569 Fulton County Sheriff's Dept. EMS Officer, LARHONDA HOLIDAY, badge #0157 Sergeant, Fulton County Sheriff's Dept. and others
Jackson v. Ham et al
as 1:2022cv03004
Plaintiff:
Dexter Conrad Jackson
Defendant:
Lavar Ham, Charles Green, Larhonda Holiday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gravitt v. Greene et al
as 2:2020cv00130
Defendant:
D. Kubler, Oliver Berg and Charles Greene
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Gravitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENE v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00112
Defendant:
L VANQUEZ, MARK INCH, COLLINS and others
Plaintiff:
ALONZO CHARLES GREENE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Corizon Medical Health Services
as 4:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Charles Green
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Boyd et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00673
Plaintiff:
Charles Green, Jr.
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Ms. Caffie and Ms. Seals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
