Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Dyal v. Internal Investigations (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00618
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Dyal
Defendant:
Agent Louria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State Attorney et al
as 6:2017cv00970
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
State Attorney, Andrew Reed, Charles Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearns v. Roberts
as 6:2016cv01446
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Kearns
Defendant:
Charles Roberts and State Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lester v. Morales
as 5:2016cv00258
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Lester
Defendant:
Edgar Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Robert et al
as 6:2016cv00326
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Charles Robert, State Attorney and Andrew Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullough v. Bendekovic
as 5:2014cv00520
Plaintiff:
Ryan McCullough
Defendant:
Ronald F. Bendekovic and Charles Robert Holloman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Tuscaloosa County et al
as 7:2014cv01622
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dewayne Booth
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County, Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa County District Attorney Office and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Wernicke v. Corizon Health Care Services, et al
as 14-12043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ROBERT WERNICKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH CARE SERVICES, a foreign corporation, WILLIAM CAMERON, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Charlotte County, FL, WILLIAM PRUMMELL, individually and in his offical capacity as Sheriff of Charlotte County, FL and others
SADLER v. MORGAN
as 4:2014cv00199
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RAY SADLER
Defendant:
MARGUERITE MORGAN, V ALBERTS, MARCELLUS TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wernicke v. Corizon Health Care Services et al
as 2:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Wernicke
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Services, William Cameron, William Prummell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
