Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Johnson v. Neel et al
as 3:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
C. Neel, C. Burnett, Nunes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. OLIVER
as 7:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
MONALETA D ALLEN
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murzike v. Durborrow et al
as 3:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
S. Durborrow, B. Reed, Sergeant Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lamb et al
as 3:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
Corian Jones
Defendant:
T. Lamb, D. Allen, K. Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Brewster, III v. District Attorney's Office, et al
as 23-12260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, PAUL COWART, TAYLOR and others
Murzike v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
D. Allen, A. Woren, M.G. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWNING v. BRANNON et al
as 5:2020cv00299
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER BRANDON, D ALLEN, CRYSTAL J WINGET and others
Plaintiff:
GINO L BROWNING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Georgia State Patrol et al
as 1:2020cv02805
Defendant:
C. D. Allen, Sgt. Julian Mapes, Georgia State Patrol and others
Plaintiff:
Mikale Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWSTER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Sheriff DONNA TOMPKINS, Judge JOHN D ALLEN, PAUL COWART and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Rahming (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Allen
Defendant:
Wilcott Rahming, Nurse Practioner Lockhart and Nurse Practitioner Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
