Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Crutchfield v. Fleiner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barney Crutchfield
Defendant:
Stacey Fleiner, D. Taylor, Kalvin Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preston v. Jackson et al
as 1:2021cv02168
Plaintiff:
Vanlen R. Preston
Defendant:
Sgt. A. Coleman, Officer Reeves, Lt. K. McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00942
Defendant:
Joseph Danzey, Officer Cookie, J. Stanford and others
Plaintiff:
Stephone D. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASSER v. STEARNS et al
as 3:2019cv04966
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER VASSER
Defendant:
B STEARNS, S FORSTER, B JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Taylor, Jr. v. State of Alabama, et al
as 16-14711
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE D. TAYLOR, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Taylor v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2014cv01682
Petitioner:
Willie D Taylor, Jr
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Broadhead et al v. Bonella et al
as 2:2014cv00934
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead, Bowman and Tyreese Cower
Defendant:
Bonella, Centovriad Olds, Oman Jo Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard Jemison v. Richard Allen, et al
as 12-11590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD JEMISON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD ALLEN, GORDY, Assistant Warden, D. TAYLOR and others
Taylor v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2009cv00993
Petitioner:
Lamont D. Taylor
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jemison v. Allen et al
as 2:2009cv01185
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Gordy, D. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
