Cases 1 - 10 of 14
BAKER v. ANDERSON et al
as 7:2019cv00043
Defendant:
CEDRIC MONTGOMERY, LARRY TAYLOR, DAVID ANDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
AVERY DANIELLE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Major v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2018cv10087
Plaintiff:
Cleon Edward Major
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States Marshal Service, David Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Meeks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00558
Plaintiff:
Zachary Chambers
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks , David Anderson , Allan Sylar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00531
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miller
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks, David Anderson, Allan Sylar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peacock v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Peacock
Defendant:
James Jackson, Thomas Kincey, Traves Yelder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey Matthews v. Dennis Meeks, et al
as 15-15674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS MEEKS, Sheriff, PRESTON HUGHES, Administrator, BILL BLUE, Sergeant and others
Humphrey v. Anderson
as 5:2014cv01734
Plaintiff:
Harold Dawan Humphrey
Defendant:
David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Meeks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00424
Plaintiff:
Grady A Lee, Sr.
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks , David Anderson , Dianne Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2012cv00656
Petitioner:
David Anderson
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2012cv01132
Plaintiff:
David Anderson
Defendant:
Jason Rodriguez, Keith Musselman and Andrew J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
