Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Johnny Lee Duke v. Warden Crabtree
as 5:2022cv00956
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Duke
Respondent:
Warden Crabtree and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michel v. Federal Bureau of Prison FCI et al
as 7:2016cv00863
Plaintiff:
Helene Michel
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison FCI, A. Washington-Adduci, Ella Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duke v. Dunn
as 2:2015cv01462
Petitioner:
Mark Duke
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cheatham et al v. Thomas et al
as 4:2014cv01952
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cheatham , Mark Duke , James Edwards and others
Defendant:
Kim Thomas , James Deloach , Terrance McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanwagner v. Baldwin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2013cv01561
Plaintiff:
John Edward Vanwagner
Defendant:
Baldwin County Sheriff's Office, Flowers, J Benett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Osborne et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00232
Plaintiff:
J.W. Dukes
Defendant:
Jerome Osborne, M.D. Ginyard and Horace Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trammell v. Dukes et al
as 5:2012cv00553
Plaintiff:
Brian Trammell
Defendant:
Dukes, Shaw, Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trammell v. Dukes et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00048
Plaintiff:
Brian Trammell
Defendant:
Mrs. Dukes, Mr. Shaw, Captain Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh v. Dix et al
as 1:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Richard Dix, Brent Guy, Jana Dukes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Roden et al
as 5:2008cv02284
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Tyler Roden, Mark Maddix, Douglas Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
