Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Smith v. Baker et al
as 3:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Sandy E. Smith
Defendant:
Judge Nina Markette Baker, City of LaGrange, The LaGrange Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Troup County Sheriff Department
as 3:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Sandy E. Smith
Defendant:
Troup County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sandy E. Smith
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Deandre Walton, Steven Crowder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Castillo et al
as 9:2022cv80690
Plaintiff:
Brandon A. Miller
Defendant:
Javier Castillo, Lauckner and Joseph E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. YANKENLLOW et al
as 5:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
DARRYL PERNELL BUTLER
Defendant:
ELLEN H YANKENLLOW, JUANITA YVETTE WILLIAMS THORPE, COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCrimmon et al v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00036
Defendant:
K. MCCARTER, L. SWANSON, Tamara Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Caron Dettmann and Sarah McCrimmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Miller v. Smith et al
as 9:2022cv80190
Plaintiff:
Brandon A. Miller
Defendant:
Joseph E. Smith, III, Castillo and Lauckner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Inch et al
as 3:2021cv01026
Plaintiff:
JATOON MOSS
Defendant:
MARK INCH, WILLIAM JEFFREY JERRELS, JOHN NETTLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ramsey et al
as 3:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sandy E. Smith
Defendant:
Officer Ramsey and Corporal Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Captain Marty Reeves and Angela Woodie
Plaintiff:
Mr. Sandy E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
