Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ernest Denson v. Marla Riley, et al
as 24-10934
Plaintiff: ERNEST LEE DENSON
Defendant: MARLA RILEY and WARDEN
ARCHIE v. ACEVEDO et al
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff: ERNEST LEE ARCHIE, JR
Defendant: JELO ACEVEDO and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHIE v. HILL et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff: ERNEST LEE ARCHIE, JR
Defendant: OBRIAN ALEXAND HILL and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denson v. Riley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00002
Plaintiff: Ernest Lee Denson
Defendant: Marla Riley, Trevonza Bobbitt, Williams Jonathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Peters We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00531
Petitioner: Ernest Lee Walker, Sr.
Respondent: Kenneth Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Braziel v. Georgia State Prison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv00065
Plaintiff: Ernest Lee Braziel
Defendant: Georgia State Prison, McCloud and Harden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest Neil v. Secretary, Department of Corr, et al
as 13-13393
Petitioner - Appellant: ERNEST LEE NEIL
Respondent - Appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Neil v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv00265
Petitioner: Ernest Lee Neil
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Braziel v. State of Georgia
as 4:2010cv00219
Petitioner: Ernest Lee Braziel
Respondent: State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Braziel v. State of Georgia
as 5:2010cv00479
Petitioner: Ernest Lee Braziel
Respondent: State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?