Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jones v. Warden
as 1:2019cv00011
Undetermined:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Frank Jones
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv02350
Plaintiff:
William Steven Robinson
Defendant:
Frank Jones, Rafferty Fuqua, Veronica Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00577
Plaintiff:
Frank Jones
Defendant:
Warden Thomas, Sgt. Clements and C. O. I. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Corbitt et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00367
Plaintiff:
Frank Jones
Defendant:
Dr. Corbitt, Dr. McAuther and CMS Health Care Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Savannah Chatham Metro Police Department
as 4:2007cv00180
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Jones
Defendant:
Savannah Chatham Metro Police Department and Harold Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2007cv81102
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Jones
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Department of Corrections
as 9:2007cv81102
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Jones
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JONES v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2007cv00190
Plaintiff:
FRANK JONES
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Edwards et al
as 4:2007cv00100
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Jones
Defendant:
Michael Edwards, William Lewis and Elizabeth Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2007cv21763
Plaintiff:
Frank Jones
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
