Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Taylor v. Crowe et al
as 1:2021cv00342
Plaintiff:
Preston Jerome Taylor
Defendant:
Officer Crowe, FNU Cox and The State of Texas/Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANSOM v. HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 4:2021cv00109
Plaintiff:
KELVIN C RANSOM, SR and KELVIN CHARLES RANSOM, SR
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00727
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEIBERT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JACOB SEIBERT
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREGORY DOZIER, SCOTT CRICKMAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zachary Taylor v. Dunn, et al
as 13-13623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZACHARY BOUVIER TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
DUNN, Corporal, HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Dunn's empolyer and CHANG, B4 Inmate
Taylor v. DUNN et al
as 4:2013cv00351
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY BOUVIER TAYLOR
Defendant:
DUNN, Harris County Sheriff's Department and CHANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWMAN v. Harris County Correctional Institution
as 4:2012cv00161
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ANTHONY BOWMAN, JR
Defendant:
Harris County Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEADFORD v. Harris County Prison et al
as 4:2011cv00155
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D HEADFORD
Defendant:
Harris County Prison, Alex Haden, FORSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Harris County Prison
as 4:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
Leslie Webb
Defendant:
Harris County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramey v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Thomas Duane Ramey
Defendant:
State of Georgia, District Attorney of Harris County and George D Martin, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
