Cases 1 - 10 of 19
NUNEZ v. DAVID et al
as 3:2023cv24725
Plaintiff:
ANDREW NUNEZ
Defendant:
J DAVID, B JONES and J HOLLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. David et al
as 5:2023cv00688
Plaintiff:
Andrew Nunez
Defendant:
J. David, B. Jones and J. Hollis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dinkle v. David et al
as 2:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Steven Joshua Dinkle
Defendant:
Lt. J. David, CO M. Anderson, Nurse Hanchey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders et al v. Mackie et al
as 2:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
J. Jay Justus Christian Sanders, Christina Haile DeBono, Elizabeth Hailesmith and others
Defendant:
V. Arthur William Mackie, L. H. Mackie, D. Mackie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SELLERS et al
as 7:2018cv00023
Plaintiff:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant:
ERIC SELLERS, JASON SUNDAY, TRACY K CHAPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Jones, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Dedric Jamar Dean
Defendant:
Karla Walker Jones, Ventress Correctional Facility, E. Laster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. State of Georgia, et al et al
as 4:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
State of Georgia, et al, Polk County Georgia, et al, Baldwin County CSH Georgia, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOUGLAS v. OBAMA et al
as 7:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J DOUGLAS
Defendant:
B OBAMA, M OBAMA, WHITTONHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Said Mobin v. Sohaila Mobin, et al
as 15-12618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAID MOBIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SOHAILA MOBIN, J. DAVID ROPER, Judge, Superior Court of Columbia County, Georgia and JOHN R.B. LONG, Attorney
Mobin v. Mobin et al
as 1:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Said Mobin
Defendant:
Sohaila Mobin, J. David Roper and John R.B. Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
