Cases 1 - 10 of 21
DAVIS v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
ROBERT JAMES DAVIS
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02642
Respondent:
Clayton County Jail
Defendant:
Clayton County Jail/Sheriff's Office and Levon Allen
Petitioner:
Patrick James Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Allen
as 1:2024cv02643
Respondent:
Levon Allen
Petitioner:
Patrick James Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Clayton County Jail/Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv02644
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Davis
Defendant:
Clayton County Jail/Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv04301
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Johnson, Inmates of Clayton County Jail, Christopher Troy Gather and others
Defendant:
Levon Allen, Clayton County Sheriff's Office and Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Broward County Main Jail et al
as 0:2022cv62133
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
Broward County Main Jail, Gregory Tony, Washtion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Pierre
as 0:2022cv62252
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
Romario Pierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
ANITA ANN JACKSON WILLIAMS, BRIAN WILLIAMS, JAMES DAVIS ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Berry et al
as 1:2016cv00559
Petitioner:
Timothy James Davis
Respondent:
Walter Berry, Samuel S. Olens and The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. MIDDLE GEORGIA MEDICAL COLLEGE
as 4:2014cv00301
Plaintiff:
ALBERT JAMES DAVIS
Defendant:
MIDDLE GEORGIA MEDICAL COLLEGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
