Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Marshall v. Nocco et al
as 8:2023cv01513
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Marshall
Defendant:
Sheriff Chris Nocco, Bailiff John Doe, Pasco County, Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Department of Detention Services et al
as 8:2023cv01546
Plaintiff:
Donnell A. Franklin
Defendant:
Department of Detention Services, Falkenburg Road Jail, Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Gato et al
as 1:2023cv21675
Plaintiff:
Rodney Thomas
Defendant:
Jackson Gato, John Doe, T. Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Gato et al
as 1:2023cv20632
Plaintiff:
Rodney Thomas
Defendant:
Jackson Gato, John Doe, Andrew Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Adkins
as 5:2021cv01459
Plaintiff:
Hernandez L Marshall
Defendant:
Cody P Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00366
Defendant:
Brittany L. Marshall, Patrice Richie Jones, J. Robbins and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin Roy Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00090
Petitioner:
Terry L Marshall
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marshall v. Richie et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00808
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Marshall
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall and Patrice Richie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marshall v. G.D.C.I. Food Service, et. al.
as 6:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jammie L. Marshall
Defendant:
G.D.C.I. Food Service, et. al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. G.D.C.I. Food Service, et. al.
as 3:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jammie L. Marshall
Defendant:
G.D.C.I. Food Service, et. al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
