Cases 1 - 10 of 256
Shawn Chalifoux v. Carlos Mendoza, et al
as 24-11562
Defendant:
CARLOS EDUARDO MENDOZA and LESLIE R. HOFFMAN
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MICHAEL CHALIFOUX
Vass v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00488
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Jamal Leslie Vass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. Florida State Prison
as 8:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Jamal Leslie Vass
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Jamal Leslie Vass
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lesly Jean-Philippe v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11528
Respondent:
FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
LESLY JEAN-PHILIPPE
Buggs v. Leslie et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00270
Defendant:
Donna Leslie, Montgomery Area Mental Health Authority and Steve Marshall
Plaintiff:
Dynassus Buggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MacDonald v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jason MacDonald
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong v. Dallas County Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Elizabeth Daniels, Dallas County Commission, Dallas County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. LESLIE et al
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
DIEGO C. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
ZAKARY LESLIE and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chalifoux v. Mendoza et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Chalifoux
Defendant:
Carlos Eduardo Mendoza and Leslie Hoffman Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
