Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Manchester, Jonathan v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00379
Respondent:
George Jr Harrigan, Craig Maguire, Amanda Lane and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan David Manchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manchester, Jonathan v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00764
Defendant:
Jamie K Davis, Robert Ant Delitta, Samantha L. English and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Manchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manchester, Jonathan v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv22782
Defendant:
Jennifer J. Ferraro, Lacie N. Mcanally, George Jr Harrigan and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Manchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Florio et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Anthony Hill
Defendant:
John Florio, Carlos Escobedo, Lacy Florio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. LAKE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
LAKE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, PATRICK MAHONEY, DADE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. United States
as 1:2023cv03849
Petitioner:
Roy Lacy Cobb
Respondent:
United States and Warden Sylvester L. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Harris et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Daniel Harris, Lacie McCall and Michell Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacy v. Jackson
as 1:2020cv02032
Petitioner:
Kendall Lacy
Respondent:
Theodore "Ted" Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lacy v. Baldwin (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00294
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Lacy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ladarius Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacy v. Alabama D.O.C. Medical Staff (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00295
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Lacy, Jr.
Defendant:
Alabama D.O.C. Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
