Cases 1 - 10 of 279
ANDERSON et al v. EARNEST et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
KYRIMA ANDERSON and PATRICK A LONG II
Defendant:
JUDGE T. CRAIG EARNEST, ELEXUS SISSON, JUDGE JOSHUA SUGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Long et al
as 8:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Chism
Defendant:
Janet C. Long, Brian Scott, Charles Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Culmer v. JSO Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Antoine A. Culmer
Defendant:
JSO Sheriffs Department, L. W. Long, Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eli Malave v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10746
Petitioner:
ELI LONG MALAVE
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
VINSON v. GARLAND
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
JASON MORGAN VINSON
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, JOY ODOM, MARC T TREADWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v. LONG et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
JESSE BANKS and JESSE BANKS, III
Defendant:
T LONG, MS. MELVIN, MICHAEL BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Beasley et al
as 6:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Dennis Long
Defendant:
Jacob Beasley, DW McFarland, Lt. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COFIELD v. LONG et al
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
RANDY EUGENE COFIELD
Defendant:
SHERIFF GARY LONG, SHAUN SOUTHERLAND, DENISE WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. LONG
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
GLEN SPEARING MATTHEWS
Defendant:
ROBERT R LONG, HARRY J FOX, JR, JOHN FRANCISCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
