Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McGill v. City of South Daytona Beach et al
as 6:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Latravia Rodriguez McGill
Defendant:
City of South Daytona Beach and David McCallister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashton v. State of Florida, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00361
Respondent:
Office of the State Attorney 20th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Chong Un McCallister, Secretary, Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Carl M. Ashton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCallister v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00444
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Kenneth R McCallister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smart v. McCallister et al
as 5:2020cv00108
Plaintiff:
Germaine Smart
Defendant:
Mitchell McCallister, Luther Smith, Malvin Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Culver et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00141
Defendant:
Sgt. Peterson, Lt. Moore, Sgt. McCallister and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00132
Defendant:
Lt. Jones, Jason Smoak, Sgt. Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00116
Defendant:
Lt. Jones, Jason Smoak, Sgt. Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWERS v. MOODY et al
as 7:2019cv00008
Plaintiff:
CHARLES POWERS
Defendant:
Nurse SELESKA, Dr EUGENE, Nurse TOMLINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. SUMMERS et al
as 3:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS LLOYD MARTIN
Defendant:
SUMMERS, GAINES, MCCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. TIFT COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER et al
as 7:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
RASHAUN DEMETRIUS SMITH
Defendant:
TIFT COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, MCCALLISTER and MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
