Cases 1 - 10 of 29
McCarter v. Inch et al
as 6:2021cv02021
Plaintiff:
Michael R. McCarter
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Jane Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrimmon et al v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00036
Defendant:
K. MCCARTER, L. SWANSON, Tamara Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Caron Dettmann and Sarah McCrimmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Smith v. Centurion Healthcare HM LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00545
Respondent:
B McCarter, FNU Halstead, Dr. Richard Johnson and others
Petitioner:
Edgar Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CENTURION HEALTHCARE HM LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00254
Plaintiff:
EDGAR LEE SMITH
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTHCARE HM LLC, B MCCARTER, HALSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CENTURION HEALTHCARE HM LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
EDGAR LEE SMITH
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTHCARE HM LLC, B MCCARTER, HALSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarter v. Myers et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott McCarter
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCarter v. Myers et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott McCarter
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeffery McCarter v. Warden, et al
as 16-10491
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFERY MCCARTER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Alexander v. Bradshaw et al
as 1:2015cv22617
Plaintiff:
Gerald Alexander
Defendant:
Cystal A. Bradshaw, David McCarter and Assistant Warden, Dade Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald Alexander v. Crystal Bradshaw, et al
as 14-13300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
CRYSTAL A. BRADSHAW, Property Room Employee, MCCARTER and R. DYKES, Assistant Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
