Cases 1 - 10 of 29
McGriff v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2023cv01451
Petitioner:
Allen Lanard McGriff
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORGAN v. GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 5:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
KENTARKUIS JAMEL MORGAN
Defendant:
GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, A POLLOCK, SNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff v. Secretary of Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv22868
Plaintiff:
Wilke McGriff, Jr. and Willie J. McGriff
Defendant:
Secretary of Department of Corrections, Chapman Partnership The Hat and Mr. Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. McGriff (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00511
Plaintiff:
William Larry Moore
Defendant:
Glenn McGriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. McGriff
as 6:2020cv00116
Plaintiff:
William Larry Moore
Defendant:
Glenn McGriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Circuit Court of Chilton County, AL et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00055
Plaintiff:
William Larry Moore
Defendant:
Glenn McGriff, Circuit Court of Chilton County, AL and Sibley Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Circuit Court of Chilton County, AL et al
as 6:2019cv01874
Plaintiff:
William Larry Moore
Defendant:
Glenn McGriff, Circuit Court of Chilton County, AL and Sibley Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGRIFF v. INCH
as 4:2019cv00016
Petitioner:
JAMES W MCGRIFF
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and MARK S INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SYLING v. THOMAS et al
as 4:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SYLING
Defendant:
L THOMAS, ELIZABETH BOYD, FERNANDO MCGRIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SYLING v. THOMAS et al
as 4:2017cv00196
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SYLING
Defendant:
THOMAS, BOYD, MCGRIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
