Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Lester v. Bennett et al
as 1:2024cv00824
Petitioner:
Henry L. Lester
Defendant:
Lovett Bennett, Jr., Li and Registered Nurse Lee
Respondent:
Judge Lovett Bennett, David Abbott, Renata Newbill-Jallow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. BEASLEY
as 7:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant:
Lt AARON KIRK, Supervisor KEVIN CONNOLLY, NED M MIKULA and others
Respondent:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Payne v. Francisco et al
as 1:2021cv04131
Plaintiff:
Eric Keith Payne
Defendant:
Dr. Francisco, Craig Owens, Nurse Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00112
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
McPherson v. Adams et al
as 6:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Sharon Osborn, Jane Doe Fajerski, John Doe Conaway and others
Plaintiff:
Brentrez Jarmykus McPherson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warth v. U. S. District Court Clerk's Office Cash Register et al
as 1:2020cv04059
Respondent:
U. S. District Court Clerk's Office Cash Register and Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank, Trustees
Petitioner:
David Warth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REGISTER v. USA
as 7:2019cv00062
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT REGISTER, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RUSHIN v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
RONALD EARLE RUSHIN
Defendant:
CALDWELL, SPANN, PUTTINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
