Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Leahy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Manatee County)
as 8:2023cv02041
Petitioner:
Rachael Natalie Leahy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEAHY v. BUSCHER
as 4:2023cv00397
Petitioner:
Rachael Leahy and RACHAEL NATALIE LEAHY
Respondent:
Jerry Buscher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nicholas v. Gilbert
as 0:2019cv62663
Plaintiff:
Damon Nicholas
Defendant:
Rachael Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Thompson et al
as 1:2018cv03296
Defendant:
Daniel J. Porter, Shannon Kulnis, Gwinnett County DA's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Kent Roberts, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crews v. Greffet et al
as 3:2017cv01282
Plaintiff:
Charles Shane Crews
Defendant:
Rachael Greffet and Prince Dauso Ode
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpley v. Morgan (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00356
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris Sharpley
Defendant:
Rachael Murphy Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gann v. Wheeler-White et al
as 4:2009cv01383
Petitioner:
Rachael McCartney Gann
Respondent:
Cynthia S. Wheeler-White and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gann v. Wheeler-White et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00538
Plaintiff:
Rachael McCartney Gann
Defendant:
Cynthia S. Wheeler-White and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ambers v. Allen et al
as 4:2008cv00823
Plaintiff:
Nathan Paul Ambers
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Bettinna Carter and Rachael Kitchens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 4:2007cv00431
Petitioner:
RACHAEL REED
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and PAIGE AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
