Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Miller v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00458
Plaintiff: Roy Lee Miller
Defendant: CO Jenkins and Lt. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Chambers, Jr. v. Warden, et al
as 18-11958
Petitioner - Appellant: ROY LEE CHAMBERS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
MCPHERSON v. BERRY et al
as 1:2018cv00067
Plaintiff: JUAN MIGUEL MCPHERSON
Defendant: WALTER BERRY, SELLS, MARSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Adams
as 1:2017cv03566
Petitioner: Roy Lee Chambers , Jr.
Respondent: Robert Adams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roy Smith v. H. Miller, et al
as 16-10737
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROY LEE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: H. MILLER, Senior Correctional Officer, CCA Wheeler, MAURICE COX, Senior Correctional Officer, CCA Wheeler, ROGERS, L.T. and others
Smith v. Miller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00079
Plaintiff: Roy Lee Smith
Defendant: H. Miller and Maurice Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reinhardt v. Flournoy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00139
Petitioner: Roy Lee Reinhardt
Respondent: V.J. Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roy Brown v. Warden, et al
as 14-12988
Petitioner - Appellant: ROY LEE BROWN
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Burns v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00636
Plaintiff: Roy Lee Burns
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections and Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magby v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01303
Petitioner: Roy Lee Magby, Jr.
Respondent: United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?