Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 235
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant: R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alphonso Tanner v. French, et al
as 24-11098
Plaintiff: ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant: FRENCH, CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Gaynett Powell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10721
Plaintiff: GAYNETT POWELL
Defendant: SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX, MARK INCH, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
TANNER v. FRENCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff: ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant: FRENCH, DIRECTOR CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonso v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: Santiago Alonso
Defendant: Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonso v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: Santiago Alonso
Defendant: Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Dixon et al
as 5:2024cv00049
Plaintiff: Alfred James Sanders
Defendant: Ricky Dixon, P. Kish, FNU Sessions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emilio Santiago v. USA
as 24-10272
Petitioner: EMILIO SANTIAGO
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jarol Santiago v. Ursula Wynn
as 23-13883
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAROL ANTONIO SANTIAGO
Defendant / Appellee: URSULA WYNN
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv02569
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?