Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Burton v. Marshall et al
as 4:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Burton
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Carol Boone, Judge Phil K Seay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Marshall et al
as 4:2024cv01083
Defendant:
Judge Phil K Seay, Steve T Marshall, Carol Bone and others
Plaintiff:
William H Cain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seay v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
Jonathan Seay
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Blankenship v. Holder et al
as 1:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Blankenship
Defendant:
Tiffany R Holder, Stansel A Brown, III, Judge Phil K Seay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv01028
Plaintiff:
Randal B McCoy
Defendant:
State of Alabama, St. Clair County, Judge Phil Seay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seay v. Price
as 1:2021cv00435
Petitioner:
Harvey Beethoven Seay, Jr.
Respondent:
Noah Trey Oliver Price, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SEAY et al v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO DEMOND SEAY, GARLAN RICHARDSON, DEMOND BRADLEY and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, CHIEF OSTRANDER, CAPTAIN JEROMMA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAIL v. TENTH JUDICIAL SAO et al
as 3:2021cv00654
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, ASHLEY MOODY, GERARD and others
Plaintiff:
JON SANDERSON CHRIS HAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seay v. Peters et al
as 2:2020cv01668
Defendant:
Officer Harrison, George Payne, Kenneth Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Marquaz Seay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seay v. Price
as 1:2020cv00515
Respondent:
Noah Trey Oliver Price, III
Petitioner:
Harvey Beethoven Seay, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
