Cases 1 - 10 of 97
SMILEY v. SMITH
as 1:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Marcus Smiley
Respondent:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smiley v. Woodall (Duval County)
as 3:2024cv00069
Petitioner:
Samuel M Smiley
Respondent:
Ronnie Woodall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smiley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Milton Smiley
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMILEY v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
MILTON SMILEY
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smiley v. Smith
as 4:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
Marcus Smiley
Respondent:
Tarmarshe Smith
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Sink et al
as 9:2023cv80460
Plaintiff:
Roger Woods
Defendant:
Ms Sink, Ms Fancie, GEO Care, Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Alverson v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dale Alverson
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Jefferson S. Dunn, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smiley v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv00844
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Smiley
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Smith, Amira D. Fox and Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smiley v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv00794
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Smiley
Defendant:
Public Defender Kathleen A. Smith, State Attorney Amira D. Fox and Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
