Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Carter v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Carter
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DICKERSON v. WARDEN et al
as 4:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant:
WARDEN, Officer Wright and Sam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DICKERSON v. WARDEN et al
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant:
WARDEN, Officer WRIGHT and Officer SAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Corizon et al
as 3:2020cv01201
Respondent:
Centurion of Florida, Corizon Health Inc, RODOLPHE LAFONTANT and others
Petitioner:
THOMAS RAY HAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. INCH et al
as 4:2019cv00097
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY HAYES
Defendant:
E L TOLEDO, DOE, JULIE L JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Dickerson v. Warden, Jenkins Correctional, et al
as 18-11286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JENKINS CC WARDEN and WARDEN
DICKERSON v. AUTRY STATE PRISON
as 1:2018cv00034
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant:
AUTRY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DICKERSON v. ADAMS
as 6:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant:
Robert Adams and ADAM JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKERSON v. ADAMS
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant:
ROBERT ADAMS and ADAM JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Ray, III v. Urology Health Team PLLC, et al
as 16-14923
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RAY, III
Defendant - Appellee:
UROLOGY HEALTH TEAM PLLC, in his/her individual and official capacity, IRA W. KLIMBERG, in his individual and official capacity and JOHN D. THOMPSON, in his individual and official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
