Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Meyer v. U.S. Probation Office
as 3:2022cv00978
Petitioner:
Adam Howard Meyer
Respondent:
U.S. Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terry et al v. U.S. Probation Office et al
as 4:2022cv00125
Petitioner:
Anthony Terry and Charliese Jones
Respondent:
U.S. Probation Office, P.O. Orlando and P.O. Supervisor Hinesman
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hernando Vergara v. U.S. Probation Office, et al
as 22-10037
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERNANDO JAVIER VERGARA
Respondent / Appellee:
U.S. PROBATION OFFICE, FRANCEAN JACKSON, SHEKEVIA C. HAWKINS and others
Faller v. Estes et al
as 1:2021cv00152
Petitioner:
James S. Faller, II
Respondent:
David Estes, U.S. Probation Office and Lori Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woods v. Car et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
Timothy Woods
Defendant:
Terry Car, S. Maxwell, U.S. Probation Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alphonso James, Sr. v. Elaine Terenzi, et al
as 11-10711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALPHONSO JAMES, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ELAINE TERENZI, Chief USPO and JOHN H. GRIGGS, III, Supervising U.S. Probation Officer
Young v. U.S. Probation Office
as 9:2011cv80020
Plaintiff:
Edwin W Young, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carlos Garza v. T. Scott Hudson, et al
as 11-10114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS GARZA
Defendant - Appellee:
T. SCOTT HUDSON, U.S. Probation Office, Atlanta, GA, WILLIAM H. THOMAS, JR., Assistant U.S. Attorney, WILLIAM A. MORRISON, Attorney at Law and others
George James v. M. Tejera, et al
as 10-14719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
M. TEJERA, Case Manager, FCC Coleman and REGINALD D. MICHAEL, Chief U.S. Probation Officer, Southern District of Florida
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
