Cases 1 - 10 of 155
Wilkes v. Johnson et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Randall Wilkes
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell and Rick Chancey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASH v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
JABBARI KEYON ASH, SR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff v. Secretary of Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv22868
Plaintiff:
Wilke McGriff, Jr. and Willie J. McGriff
Defendant:
Secretary of Department of Corrections, Chapman Partnership The Hat and Mr. Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
PATTERSON v. WILKES
as 5:2023cv00267
Petitioner:
DANIEL RAY PATTERSON
Defendant:
WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Wilkes
as 1:2023cv01998
Petitioner:
Marvin Martin
Respondent:
Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FOSTER v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
JOHN M FOSTER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WILKES, WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Shavers et al
as 4:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Tommie Jermaine Jones
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Shavers, Sicera Wilkes, Summer Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. Wilkes
as 1:2023cv01233
Petitioner:
Sentavious Leonard
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonard v. Scottwilkes
as 1:2023cv01199
Petitioner:
Sentavious Leonard
Respondent:
Warden Scottwilkes and Warden Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STAPLES v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RANDY STAPLES
Defendant:
Commissioner TYRONE OLIVER, Warden SCOTT WILKES, WELLPATH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
