Cases 1 - 10 of 634
Lancaster v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Martha Lancaster
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Monica McCoy and John Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. The Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00455
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens, Chadwick Crabtree, Jeremy Pelzer and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutt v. Carter
as 7:2024cv00902
Petitioner:
Devontay Jerrod Hutt
Respondent:
Warden T Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gray v. Abbett et al
as 3:2024cv00384
Defendant:
Jimmy Abbett, Myles Carter Mitchell Kellum and Tallapoosa County
Plaintiff:
Connie Michelle Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Williams et al
as 6:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Donnie Lee Bailey
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Burt, Rache Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Chilton County (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00500
Respondent:
Chilton County
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Knight v. Calloway et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00337
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Z. Rivers, Tyler W. Norman and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Antwoan Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Gordy (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00359
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy
Petitioner:
Edmond A. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Gordy (INMATE 3)
as 7:2024cv01042
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy
Petitioner:
Edmond A. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Carter
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
