Cases 1 - 10 of 11
William Watson v. Limestone CF Warden, et al
as 23-13460
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM DALE WATSON
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and LIMESTONE CF WARDEN
Watson v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2022cv01386
Petitioner:
William Dale Watson
Respondent:
Chadwick Crabtree and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jaeger v. Graddick et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv01035
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Charles Graddick and Steven T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
William Dale Jeager and William Dale Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bramlett v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00377
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, Jason Smoak and James Brazier
Plaintiff:
William Dale Bramlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bramlett v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00369
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, Tony Murphy and James Brazier
Plaintiff:
William Dale Bramlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bramlett v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00187
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, Officer Caine and Commander Brazier
Plaintiff:
William Dale Bramlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bramlett v. Dunn et al
as 5:2017cv01371
Plaintiff:
William Dale Bramlett
Defendant:
Jefferson S Dunn and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Holley v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 15-15599
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM DALE HOLLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JULIE L. JONES
Sherrill v. City of Harlem Police Dept. et al
as 1:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
William Dale Sherrill, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Harlem Police Dept., Rick Baxter and Gary Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherrill v. City of Harlem Police Dept. et al
as 1:2015cv02667
Plaintiff:
William Dale Sherrill, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Harlem Police Dept., Rick Baxter and Gary Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
