Cases 1 - 10 of 6,219
LE BOSS v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
RYAN TODD LE BOSS
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Zebranek, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11972
Petitioner:
JAMES D. ZEBRANEK, JR.
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Lockhart, Roderick v. State of Florida
as 0:2024cv61026
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Lockhart
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spratling v. Patterson et al
as 1:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Spratling
Defendant:
Patterson, Baird, Trent Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehead, Michael v. Ortega et al
as 1:2024cv22295
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Whitehead
Defendant:
O. Ortega, E. Del Peso and D. Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. Harula
as 3:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kenel
Defendant:
D. W. Harula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Tlusty v. D. Swain, et al
as 24-11921
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. TLUSTY
Defendant:
D. SWAIN, Correctional Officer, K. DAVIS, Correctional Officer, J. ELLENBURG, Correctional Officer and others
Singleton v. United States Of America
as 2:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Ervin Singleton, Erwin Debinion Singleton, Ervin Debinion Singleton and others
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
VANDERFORD v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
PERRY GENE VANDERFORD
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES IRS and INMATE TRUST FUND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. ROESKE et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
TYSON N WATSON
Defendant:
N ROESKE and D J LAVERGNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
