Cases 1 - 10 of 1,501
Rivera v. The City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Linwood L. Rivera, Sr.
Defendant:
The City of Jacksonville, Police Officer #1 and Police Officer #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. DeSantis et al
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Cole
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, City of Jacksonville, Patrick Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Smith et al.
as 6:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
William Andre Jemel Wright
Defendant:
Officer L. Smith and City of Oviedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olandis Hobbs v. State of Florida, et al
as 24-11833
Petitioner:
OLANDIS DEAN HOBBS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, SHERIFF, BAY COUNTY, BAY COUNTY JAIL and others
Le v. Mims et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Le
Defendant:
Beth Mims, City of Jemison and Rickey Patrick Self
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaston v. City of Leesburg et al
as 5:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Angel E. Gaston
Defendant:
City of Leesburg, Lake County, Joseph A Iozzy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant:
Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Tampa
as 1:2024cv02143
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
City of Tampa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dai-Juan Taylor v. Fulton County District Attorney, et al
as 24-11513
Plaintiff:
DAI-JUAN TAIKAIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
FULTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, POLICE CHIEF OF FAIRBURN, GA, FAIRBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
