Cases 91 - 100 of 824
Heath v. DoorDash, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Heath
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc. and Henry Van Fleet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Naramore et al v. City of Jasper, Alabama
as 6:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Eric Naramore, Kenneth Adam Miller, Terri Fields and others
Defendant:
City of Jasper, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
HART v. HOLLAND et al
as 5:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN HARTMAN and BENJAMIN ESTABON CARLITO HART
Defendant:
HEATH HOLLAND, JOSEPH FLOYD, B SHOUPPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HETZEL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10209
Plaintiff:
HEATH ELDEN HETZEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VOTE.ORG et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defendant:
CORD BYRD, KIM BARTON, CHRISTOPHER MILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEATH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09136
Plaintiff:
KEN HEATH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Benjamin Heath
as 23-11187
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BENJAMIN CLARK HEATH
Harrison v. Williams, et al.
as 1:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Crystal Michelle Harrison and Crystal M. Harrison
Defendant:
Shanthon Williams, Sheriff Heath Jackson and County Commission of Escambia County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lape v. Williams, et al.
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Hayli Lape
Defendant:
Shanthon Williams, Sheriff Heath Jackson and County Commission of Escambia County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
