Cases 91 - 100 of 25,518
Lines, Keith v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv61428
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Keith Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Easley, Robert v. Dr. Diaz et al
as 1:2024cv23004
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Easley
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Steven Wheeler and Dr. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00792
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Russell David Tillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00794
Petitioner:
Anthony Michael Ortiz
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haar v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia County)
as 6:2024cv01445
Petitioner:
Robert S. Haar
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wheeler v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00795
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, T. Bowden, Ricky D. Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Reyes Ramos v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-12533
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
JOSE A. REYES RAMOS
Mark Boyd v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections
as 24-12542
Petitioner:
MARK BRADLEY BOYD
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Nicholas Barbati v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-12523
Defendant:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BARBATI
Stephen Moretto v. M. Wilson, et al
as 24-12531
Defendant:
M. WILSON, F. BONES, T.L. DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MORETTO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
