Cases 91 - 100 of 148
Howell v. Palmer et al
as 3:2014cv00144
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Howell
Defendant:
John Palmer , Michael D. Crews and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez et al v. Palmer et al
as 3:2014cv00110
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Chavez
Defendant:
John Palmer , Michael D Crews and John Does(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Taylor et al
as 1:2013cv00986
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jefferson Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Andrew Thomas Taylor, Jr , Naomi Alazraki Taylor , Louis Richard Cohan and others
Radomski v. Anchor Funding Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00753
Plaintiff:
John Radomski
Defendant:
Anchor Funding Corporation , U.S. Bank, N.A. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Head et al v. Henry County et al
as 1:2013cv00664
Plaintiff:
Latrena Head , Percy Head , Percy Heard and others
Defendant:
Henry County, Keith McBrayer, Chad Rosborough and others
Chamber of Industry and Commerce Wuppertal-Solingen-Remscheid v. Stewart et al
as 8:2013cv00563
Petitioner:
Chamber of Industry and Commerce Wuppertal-Solingen-Remscheid
Respondent:
Martha Stewart , Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. , Emeril Lagasse and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Strickland v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2013cv00435
Plaintiff:
Alfreda Strickland
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon , Jane and John Doe(s) and Bank of America Home Loans
Robinson v. Freedom Morgage et al
as 1:2012cv03631
Plaintiff:
Melinda J. Robinson
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage , Jane and John Doe(s) and Against The Entire World
Thomas v. Sides et al
as 1:2012cv00111
Plaintiff:
Maurice Thomas
Defendant:
Mathew Sides, Jason Broome, Augusta-Richmond County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
