Cases 91 - 100 of 173
USA v. John Bradham
as 18-12346
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD BRADHAM
Files v. King et al
as 1:2017cv01632
Plaintiff:
Earnest J Files, Jr
Defendant:
Julian M King, John Edward Rochester, Steven Dale Giddens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2017cv00259
Plaintiff:
John Edward Pickett, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin J. Rambosk, FNU Gangl, Commander McGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pirela v. Fernandez Rundle et al
as 1:2017cv21461
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant:
Katherine Fernandez Rundle, Christine Zahralban, Angel Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pickett v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
John Edward Pickett, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin J. Rambosk, FNU Gangl, FNU McGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pirela v. Unknown Bar of Homosexuals and False Witnesses Used et al
as 1:2017cv21311
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant:
Unknown Bar of Homosexuals and False Witnesses Used, Thomas Williams, John Edward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 8:2017cv00691
Plaintiff:
John Edwards
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Pirela v. The State of Florida et al
as 1:2017cv21125
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pirela
Defendant:
The State of Florida, Angel Miranda, Denis Fonseca and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Durden et al v. Zapporoo, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv25331
Plaintiff:
Andrew Durden , Carlos Viso , Christopher Dieguez and others
Defendant:
Zapporoo, LLC, Joel Cordle II, Joshua Damien Cordle and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Strole v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv02596
Petitioner:
John Edward Strole
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
