Cases 91 - 100 of 273
Freeman v. Beneficial Mortgage Company
as 1:2013cv01722
Plaintiff:
Anthony Freeman
Defendant:
Beneficial Mortgage Company and McCurdy & Candler LLC
Jackson v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01372
Plaintiff:
Eunice Jackson
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Phelan Hallinan & Jones LLC , Home America Mortgage and others
Griffin et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Griffin and Amy E. Griffin
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , McCurdy & Candler, LLC and BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company National Association v. Williams
as 1:2013cv00901
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company National Association
Defendant:
Todd Williams
Thirdparty_defendant:
Homecomings Financial, LLC , Austin Brokers Real Estate, Cory C. Close and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Todd Williams
Counter_claimant:
Todd Williams
Counter_defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company National Association
Sampson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Rodney D. Sampson
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. and McCurdy & Candler, LLC
Rauf v. PNC Bank et al
as 1:2013cv00706
Plaintiff:
Tahisha Rauf
Defendant:
PNC Bank, PNC Mortgage, McCurdy & Candler and others
Reed v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00678
Plaintiff:
Terrance Reed
Defendant:
Dovenmuehle Mortgage Inc., Federal National Mortgage and McCurdy & Candler
Pinnock v. Selena Finance et al
as 1:2013cv00501
Plaintiff:
Delroy Pinnock
Defendant:
Selena Finance, Albertelli Law, Aurora Bank, FSB and others
MaGee v. Barbagelata et al
as 1:2013cv00300
Plaintiff:
Arlene Turner MaGee
Defendant:
Daniel K. Barbagelata , McCurdy & Candler, LLC and National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
