Cases 91 - 100 of 345
Green v. UPS, Co.
as 0:2021cv61763
Defendant:
UPS, Co., United Parcel Service Co. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ira Green
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cowan v. McKenzie et al
as 1:2021cv01046
Plaintiff:
Jessica Ainslee Cowan
Defendant:
Sean Patrick McKenzie and United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00656
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kyle Roig, et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al
as 21-11915
Defendant / Appellee:
ROMAINE SEGUIN, an individual, THOMAS O'MALLEY, an individual and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a business entity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAIL OLIVERA, an individual, THE ESTATE OF SAMUEL I. ROIG, by and through its Personal Representative Gail Olivera, SAM ROIG, an individual and others
Ryan Walker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 21-11267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Kyle Roig, et al v. UPS, et al
as 20-14759
Defendant / Appellee:
ROMAINE SEGUIN, an individual, THOMAS O'MALLEY, an individual and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a business entity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAIL OLIVERA, an individual, THE ESTATE OF SAMUEL I. ROIG, by and through its Personal Representative Gail Olivera, SAM ROIG, an individual and others
Peek v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04902
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Emery Johnson
Plaintiff:
Keith Peek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bice v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 1:2020cv01435
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Plaintiff:
Darrell Bice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.