Cases 101 - 110 of 203
Cadle v. Regal Ideas, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv01435
Defendant:
Amazon.com LLC and Regal Ideas, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Donald I. Cadle, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Island Jay, Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv01294
Plaintiff:
Island Jay, Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon.Com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Harris v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 1:2021cv02207
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Ahkira Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Solomon v. Amazon.co, LLC
as 5:2021cv00284
Plaintiff:
JON SOLOMON
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tower Hill Signature Insurance Company v. Lenric, C21, Ltd., et al
as 8:2021cv01106
Plaintiff:
Tower Hill Signature Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pet Supply Imports, Inc., Amazon.Com Services LLC, Lenric International, Ltd and others
Interested Party:
Kelly Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company v. Lenric C21, Ltd. et al
as 8:2021cv01096
Plaintiff:
Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pet Supply Imports, Inc., Amazon.Com Services LLC, Lenric International, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lovell et al v. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
as 1:2021cv21724
Plaintiff:
Clayton Lovell, Jr., Andrew Lovell, Sarah Lovell and others
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Giant Eagle Markets, Inc., BJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCausland v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 8:2021cv01036
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kristy McCausland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brownlee v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 0:2021cv60921
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIA BROWNLEE
Defendant:
DWAYNE THOMAS, AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC and MARK HITCHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
J.R. VIDEOS INTERNATIONAL, INC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2021cv21586
Plaintiff:
J.R. VIDEOS INTERNATIONAL, INC
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
