Cases 101 - 110 of 517
Cropper v. Palmer et al
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Cropper
Defendant:
Judge Emory Palmer, Herb Cranford, Jr., Azi Golshan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MYERS et al
as 1:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
MARK S DAVIS
Defendant:
WARDEN MYERS, DEPUTY WARDEN WILLIE MOBLEY, CAPT ZIRKLE RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. City of Cartersville et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Daidron Williams, Eutychus Wilson, Aaron Conelly and others
Defendant:
Cullen LaFrance, Joshua Coker, Mark Mayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davy v. DayRise Residential, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Travys Davy
Defendant:
DayRise Residential, LLC, IC Citymark Evergreen Terrace, LLC and John or Jane Doe I Property Manager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ROBINSON v. DRAKE et al
as 3:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
DRAKE, ROBERT, ROVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Ridley et al
as 2:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
William E. Thomas
Defendant:
Officer Ridley, J.P. Carner, Emily Salema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPIVEY v. WARDEN et al
as 5:2021cv00398
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
UNKNOWN WARDEN, ASSISTANT WARDEN A W UNKNOWN, PSYCHOLOGICAL TEAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starks v. Dawson et al
as 1:2021cv04396
Plaintiff:
William L. Starks
Defendant:
James Dawson, Louis Deckmar, Lundy Mayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fiorito v. Martin et al
as 1:2021cv03802
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Defendant:
Dr. Martin, The United States, A. W. Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SNELLING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 6:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Snelling, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Georgia Department of Correction and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
