Cases 101 - 110 of 165
Broadhead v. Gay et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00150
Defendant:
Brian Wilson, Gwendolyn Babers, Eleval Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fagan v. Richie (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00151
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Fagan
Defendant:
Patrice Richie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McConico v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Parole et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00111
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Eddie Cook, Alabama Board of Pardons & Parole, Lyn Head and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Koger v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Cpt. Lamar, Alabama Department of Corrections, Patrice Richie and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Koger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Richie et al
as 5:2019cv00036
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and P Richie
Petitioner:
David Tinsley Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mastin v. Richie et al
as 3:2019cv00030
Petitioner:
Eddie Edward Mastin
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Patrice Richie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Care, Captain Lamar and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Richie et al (INMATE 2) (LEAD)
as 2:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Warden McClain, Wexford Health Care, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Consolidated Defendant:
Mary Collins, Mr. Turner, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. Richie et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2019cv00002
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall and Patrice Richie
Plaintiff:
Artie James Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00995
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Dr. Siddig and Patrice Richie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
