Cases 101 - 110 of 4,060
Briones v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00790
Petitioner:
Wofford Briones and Briones Wofford
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wofford v. State of Georgia
as 4:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Briones Wofford
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Nation v. Towns County State of Georgia, et al
as 24-10534
Petitioner:
DAVID WILLIAMS NATION
Respondent:
TOWNS COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA and WARDEN
Scott v. McFarland
as 3:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Darrell Bernard Scott, Jr
Respondent:
Andrew McFarland
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Billings v. Shavers
as 3:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
Eric Isaiah Billings
Respondent:
Warden Brian Shavers
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Georgia et al v. Wyndham Vacation (Resorts) Ownership, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia, Donna Marie Smith and Ernest Welch Smith
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation (Resorts) Ownership, Inc., Wyndham Vacation Club, Wyndham Vacation Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Parker v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00665
Petitioner:
Otis Parker
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Julius Larry
as 24-10432
Petitioner:
In re: JULIUS LARRY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Mitchell v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Mitchell
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Judge Susan E. Edlein, Assistant Solicitor Jamie Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
