Cases 111 - 120 of 171
USA v. John Haldemann
as 15-13873
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT HALDEMANN
Alexander Patterson, IV v. Supreme Court of the United St, et al
as 15-13546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER PATTERSON, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, JOHN ROBERTS, 17th Chief Justice of the United States, ANTONIN SCALIA, Associate Justice of U.S. Supreme Court and others
In re: John Quick
as 15-12687
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN ROBERT QUICK
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Pantazes v. John Roberts Associates et al
as 6:2014cv02133
Plaintiff:
Stephen James Pantazes
Defendant:
John Roberts Associates, John Roberts and Michael Rak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roberts v. Wright Medical Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02592
Plaintiff:
John Roberts
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGhee v. USA
as 1:2014cv00226
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Robert McGhee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hansbrough et al v. HITT Contracting, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01355
Plaintiff:
John Robert Hansbrough and Gisele Hansbrough
Defendant:
HITT Contracting, Inc. , CERTIFIED FINISHES, INC. and GBE.FLOORING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McShea v. The School Board Of Collier County et al
as 2:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
Dorene McShea
Defendant:
The School Board Of Collier County , John Robert Gardner , Yolanda Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv03226
Petitioner:
John Robert Clifton
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sebo v. Regions Bank
as 2:2013cv00876
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Plaintiff:
John Robert Sebo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
