Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 111 - 120 of 125
Thomas v. Rathman
as 1:2010cv02301
Plaintiff: Gary K. Thomas
Defendant: John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Rathman et al
as 1:2010cv02105
Petitioner: Gary K. Thomas
Respondent: John T. Rathman and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moreno-Godoy v. Rathman
as 1:2010cv01529
Petitioner: Luis Felipe Moreno-Godoy
Respondent: John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Andrew v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv21159
Plaintiff: Gregory Andrew
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons, John T. Rathman, Darrell Acre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myles v. Rathman
as 0:2009cv61813
Plaintiff: George Frank Myles, Jr.
Defendant: John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gholikhan v. Federal Detention Center of Miami et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv22762
Plaintiff: Shahrzad Mir Gholikhan
Defendant: Federal Detention Center of Miami, John T. Rathman, Management Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Defontes v. Rathman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv22680
Plaintiff: Nicole Michelle Defontes
Defendant: John T. Rathman, Carlos Rodriguez and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
B.P. v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv21486
Plaintiff: B.P.
Defendant: United States of America, John T. Rathman, Damioun Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Rathman
as 1:2009cv21204
Plaintiff: Stenneth Barnett
Defendant: John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Montero v. Rathman
as 1:2008cv23030
Plaintiff: Tony Montero
Defendant: John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?