Cases 11 - 20 of 519
WILLIAMS v. BERSA S A et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
WAYMON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BERSA S A, EAGLE IMPORTS INC, TALON DISTRIBUTING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carruth v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01294
Petitioner:
Terrence Carruth
Respondent:
John or Jane Doe and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deandre Arnold v. Hillsborough County Sheriff, et al
as 24-10634
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
CHAD CHRONISTER, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF, ADRIEL GONZALES and others
SMITH v. MCDANIEL et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO SMITH
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, FULLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARRUTH v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE CARRUTH
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deandre Arnold
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Chronister, Deputy Adriel Gonzales, Deputy Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SULLIVAN v. WARD et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WALTER BARRY, WARDEN DARRIN MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Bondary McCall
as 23-14099
Petitioner:
In re: BONDARY MCCALL
Respondent:
CLERK - NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, JOHN OR JANE DOE, REBECCA and others
DANIELS v. WEST et al
as 1:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
DESMOND DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
OFC WEST, OFC THOMAS, JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagans et al v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Julia Hagans, Solomon Lee, Sr. and Julia Hagins
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Brooks Benton, Michael Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
